In late 1977, as the Chilean military junta extended the state of siege in place since its 1973 coup and formally dissolved all political parties, Friedrich Hayek wrote a letter to a German newspaper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, to protest what he depicted as unfair international criticism of the government of General Augusto Pinochet. When his article was rejected, he wrote to the editor expressing disappointment that the newspaper lacked the “civil courage” to resist popular anti-Pinochet sentiment.
Hayek singled out the human rights organization Amnesty International for turning “slander [into] a weapon of international politics.” After accepting an invitation to lecture in Chile, he complained, he was inundated with phone calls, letters, and anti-Pinochet material by “well-intentioned people I did not know but also from organizations like ‘Amnesty International,’” who asked him to cancel his visit. Hayek’s fellow Mont Pèlerin Society member, the Chicago School economist Milton Friedman, later echoed this assessment, describing Chile as an economic and political “miracle.”
Neither Hayek nor Friedman were detached observers of this “miracle.” Both men gave advice to Pinochet, and both had disciples in his authoritarian government —
— source jacobin.com | Jessica Whyte | 09.11.2023