Mark Colville talking:
what i did almost a year ago now, it was December 9, 2013, I attempted to intervene on behalf of of the family in Afghanistan that has experienced the unspeakable trauma of witnessing loved ones being blown to pieces in a drone strike. One member of that family, a man named Raz Mohammad, last year, wrote a personal plea to the U.S. courts and the government as well as the military to stop these drone strikes on his people.
Raz Mohammad from Afghanistan, said: “I think drones are not good. I remember how, in my village, a drone attack killed my brother-in-law and four of his friends. It was truly sad. A beautiful life was buried and the sound of crying and sorrow arose from peaceful homes. I say that this is inhumane. Today, the idea of humanity has been forgotten. Why do we spend money like this? Why don’t we use alternative ways? The international community says that drones are used to kill the Taliban. This is not true. We should see the truth. Today, it’s hard to find the truth and no one listens to the ordinary voice of the people”
we took Raz’s written plea and we walked peacefully and orderly to the outside gate of the 174th Attack Wing at Hancock Airfield with the sole purpose of trying to deliver this plea directly to one of the base commanders who name is Colonel Earl Evans. We brought — it was Advent, the season of Advent in the Christian churches, and we brought along a litany of prayers for saints and martyrs. We brought poinsettia and a dozen roses along with Raz’s plea, and we simply wanted to have that received by the base commander.
The base personnel indicated that Colonel Evans was not going to come out, and so then we simply asked if we could have Raz’s plea received and acknowledged. At that point, the military personnel were ordered not to engage us anymore in conversation. And so we decided to just remain there until we received a response. About an hour later, the local police came and arrested us. I should say that the drone base located within the jurisdiction of this court where i am appearing today for sentencing, it is operating beyond the reach of law. And that was really the reason why chose to go to the base. I wanted Raz’s plea to be heard in a court. This appeared to be the only way that a court would hear it. And in fact, it was read in open court by one of the military personnel who i cross-examined.
the drone program operates — it’s based on a foundation of criminality. I mean, the United States government through its drone program, is claiming the legal right to targeted assassinations, extrajudicial killings, indiscriminate killing, and the targeting — deliberate targeting of civilians. For example, even the military admits that one of its modes of operation in drone strikes is something that they have called double tapping. Which is that after striking the target, the drone is directed back to that same target 20 minutes or a half an hour later in order to strike again after first responders have come to help the wounded. So, it’s on a foundation of criminality. As we have experienced in the numerous public actions and arrests at Hancock Airfield, this program operates beyond the reach of courts and law. And what we’re trying to do is to get courts to engage the criminality in which the united states government is engaged through the drone program.
in large part, the drone program is operated in secrecy. We do know that the Hancock drone base, the 174th Attack Wing, focuses its missions on Afghanistan. Their weaponized drones, they carry Hellfire missiles and 500 pound bombs and. It’s very difficult to get specific information about which attacks are launched were directed from which drone base. There are about a dozen throughout the United States that we know about. And we’re trying to just bring this to light. We’re trying to have this brought to the scrutiny of the courts. Now, I’m going to court this afternoon about seven hours from now. I was convicted of five separate charges for simply walking peacefully to the front outside gate of the drone base.
Two counts of disorderly conduct, one of trespass — which, by the way, are conflictual charges because the one requires that you — the act take place on public property and the other on private property. Obstruction of governmental administration, which is the obstruction of lawful government administration. Which we contend, and i contended in court, that the operation behind the gates of Hancock is not lawful. I was also charged with a contempt of court charge based on kind of a cynical manipulation of the law that this court has engaged in by issuing orders of protection on behalf of of the base commander, Colonel Evans, against protesters, as if we are a physical threat to Colonel Evans. So, they’ve actually manipulated these domestic violence laws, essentially, to try to intimidate people and keep them from going to exercise their rights outside the base.
I’m telling my kids, and they understand, that whatever hardships that we are about to endure through the injustice of this court, that we should keep Raz Mohammad’s family ever in our vision and try to unite our own sufferings to the incredible sufferings that he and his extended family have gone through. And that’s the way that we go forward. We are well prepared for whatever the judge decides to do. As i intend to tell the judge, anything that he does in the court today makes no condemnation of my actions. The court is condemning itself by stopping up its ears to the law.
— source democracynow.org
Mark Colville, member of Amistad Catholic Worker in New Haven, Connecticut. He is being sentenced today for protesting outside the Hancock Field Air National Guard Base.