There is no end in sight to the longest war in U.S. history. In a prime time address Monday, President Trump vowed to step up the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan, which began nearly 16 years ago. While Trump offered few specifics, he has reportedly signed off on a plan to send about 4,000 more troops to Afghanistan. This comes as the U.S. is already intensifying its air war. During the month of June, the United States carried out 389 airstrikes in Afghanistan; the highest monthly total in five years.
Trump’s top generals had been pressing Trump to deploy thousands more U.S. troops, while former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and other members of the administration had been pushing to privatize the U.S. war and send in thousands of military contractors.
Matthew Hoh talking:
it was vile and disgusting, fear based demagoguery. I am pleased that he did reference Charlottesville, not for what I believe was his intention, which I think was everybody should get in line and obey and realize the good things we have in this country and so be unified, but rather because what happens in this country is inextricably linked to what we do overseas. That the wars we have overseas define the wars we have here at home. And that is impossible for us to have peace here at home until we have peace abroad. There’s no coincidence that we’re the largest arms exporter in the world and we are also the nation that has 350 million guns, right? That we have the most prisoners in the world and we have killed over one million Iraqis since 2003. So, I was glad he made that linkage, whether or not — even though that was not his intention by any means. However, I’m greatly saddened, of course, because there was nothing in that speech besides the prospect of more killing. And what I saw as is continue American evolution in its foreign policy, of its military policy to one of just of evolving to punishment, of — we’re no longer going to try and even attempt to have political control. We’re going to go to a policy like we’re seeing in Yemen. I think like — and I’m sure Azmat can speak much better than I can to this, what we saw, though, in terms of what happened in Fallujah and Tikrit and Mosul, to just simple punishment, sheer destruction to deal with the forces out — to deal with the areas outside of our empire. And I think that is what we will see in Afghanistan. Because whatever troops we send to Afghanistan will be meant to increase at the Afghans ability to do commando raids, so to send more troops into people’s homes in the middle of the night to punish them, to kill and capture people in the middle of the night, as well as to launch artillery strikes of airstrikes. I think this is definitely part of Jim Mattis’ and John Kelly’s influence on President Trump.
There is this book that all Marine Corps officers — and I was in the Marines — I was an officer in the Marines — was required to read. And I think the influence of Jim Mattis and Kelly can’t be underestimated here. And there is a book that would have influenced them by T.R. Fehrenbach called “This Kind of War” about the Korean War and about how the United States was not prepared for Korea and how, basically, summarizes how there are tigers in this world and how we almost lost Korea because we underestimated the Tigers in this world. But Fehrenbach connects the Marine Corps and its legacy to the legionnaires of the Roman Empire. If you look at how Kelly and Mattis describe themselves and carry themselves, they see themselves as modern-day legionnaires. And it’s particularly Kelly, if you see how he talks, you can see Kelly’s description of this war as a war for our way of life and how we must do anything. And also to Kelly’s speeches when he was in charge of Southern Command about how we don’t need to understand the enemy, we only need to kill him. And this goes very much in line with President Trump’s rhetoric. How we don’t need to understand the enemy, we only need to kill them. So, of course, there will be no diplomacy. And then of course, General Mattis, who is first to praise himself, always speaking about his 8,000 book library, how he is the preeminent warrior scholar of his time, these are men who see themselves, again, as modern-day legionnaires. And so, I think there is no reason for anyone else to have any influence in these matters besides the two of them, except for maybe H.R. McMaster, who is the national security adviser who 20 years ago wrote a book called “Dereliction of Duty” how the generals in the Vietnam War failed their soldiers and the American public by betraying their principles and not acknowledging that the Vietnam War was unwinnable and immoral, that it was built on lies, just as the Afghan war is unwinnable, immoral, and built on lies. And so, General McMaster is also this Greek tragedy of a persona because 20 years after he publishes this book, he himself is this character.
So these are the three men, these generals, who are advising President Trump. And I think you can see all three aspects of these men in the president’s speech last night. Of course, while you don’t see any mention of diplomacy, you don’t see any change in policy other than a hardening of policy and these tropes about we must kill the terrorists, they’re coming for us, everyone must be afraid, we all must unify, no one has any other input, we all must unify. And also too, I think that’s why we saw no mention of a troop increase. Over the past six months we have heard — we have seen the Department of Defense change its policy. We have seen the Department of Defense put troops into Kuwait and say, “we’re just going to put troops into Iraq basically whenever we want.” They have said, “we’re not going to say how many troops we’re putting into Iraq, we’re only going to give you unit names and rough numbers or estimates of numbers.” Basically, I think General Kelly and general Mattis view anything such as the media asking for troop numbers as an annoyance, as something that they don’t have to respect or — you know, something that isn’t deserved to be recognized because they are in the process of defending the empire. Again, they are modern-day legionnaires. So diplomacy is not anything they need.
I go to one of my favorite Eisenhower quotes, President Eisenhower quotes. What I said earlier, Amy, both President Eisenhower and also President Kennedy recognized, as well as Dr. Martin Luther King, recognize this intersection that the wars abroad are intersected with the wars at home, that we can’t have peace at home while having war abroad. As long as we have $700 billion defense budgets, we will never have universal health care. As long as both political parties vote for killing in war and prisons, we will never prioritize taking care of our own people. But, what President Eisenhower said, was, looking at a chair in the oval office, he said, “I pity this country if a man ever sits in this chair who has never served in the military.” And what he meant by that was that, not that the military gives you some level of expertise or some level of knowledge, or some level of experience, but that a civilian would be run roughshod over, that he wouldn’t be able to raise the BS flag, that he would not know that the generals are just going to lie to him over and over and over again. And because that is ultimately what war is, just one continual lie. And that is what we have seen in Afghanistan, that’s what we’ve seen in Iraq, that’s what we’ve seen in Vietnam, etc., etc. And I think that’s what’s happening here. And of course President Trump is probably, may be our most malleable and easily influenced president of all time.
____
Matthew Hoh
senior fellow with the Center for International Policy. In 2009 he resigned from the State Department in protest against the Obama administration’s escalation of the war in Afghanistan.
— source https://www.democracynow.org/2017/8/22/state_dept_official_who_quit_in 2017-08-23